• Home
  • News
  • Web Buzz
  • Sci / Tech
  • Bizarre
  • Videos

Why Nobody Really Gives A Crap About The WGA Strike

Posted 782 days 11 hrs 59 min ago 
 

How many weeks are we into the [tag]writer’s strike[/tag] anyway? It must be like week 384 based on the hysterical wailings of just about every media source you can name. Apparently we should soon be visited by plague and pestilence unless the writers get another 0.3% of DVD royalties and a 10% discount on all Venti Soy Lattes at [tag]Starbucks[/tag] (non-fat milk of course).

Now you might think, ‘Yes, but with the glamorous, jet set lifestyle at WOTDaily you don’t need TV. What about the rest of us?” As I’ve learned from both CNN and USAToday, nothing makes your point better than some large graphs and charts (take that writers, who needs you when we have 3D bar charts?)

wga1.jpg
Survey conducted by Pepperdine University

The good folks at [tag]Pepperdine[/tag] recently conducted a survey to try to accurately measure how little of a crap the general public gives about the [tag]WGA[/tag] strike. I can say from some experience that measuring crap giving in these small amounts is very difficult. Now, I happen to own a calculator and after intense analysis I have concluded that 95% of people are, at most, somewhat concerned by the strike. I may be going out on a limb, but when the most you can muster up is 16% somewhat concerned about an issue then its time to rethink your demands. I mean I was somewhat concerned how cold the toilet seat was going to be when I headed to the bathroom today, which is roughly 453% more concerned than I was with whether a new episode of According To Jim was going to be on.

Now to be fair, maybe the folks surveyed really hadn’t grasped the portent of the situation. I mean had they thought this through? Did they really know what this meant to their Monday nights in front of the TV? Apparently they did:

wga2.jpg
Survey conducted by Pepperdine University

Ok, so what is wrong with these pictures from the strike? Take a close look.

wga3.jpg

wga4.jpg

Are they going to camp or are they going on strike? Did that one girl bring a puppy? And I am pretty sure that 13 year old kid is not a union writer. (I won’t even mention the fat gal next to the Top Model poster, you can thank me later).

Here are a few tips for the strikers to gain a little more public support:

  • Less girls in jean skirts
  • Less puppies
  • Less lattes
  • More fire hoses
  • More German Shephards
  • More riot gear, tear gas and batons

If your strike isn’t worth German Shephards, riot gear, tear gas and batons, maybe it’s time to go home. Compare the WGA strike photos with this one from 1912 in Lawrence, Massachusetts.

. . . immigrants were striking against the newly announced law that cut the women and children’s fifty-six-hour workweek to a fifty-four-hour workweek. In addition, they also cut the men’s workweek to the same as the women’s. This new law was to be in effect on January 1, 1912. It doesn’t seem like this would create problems, but it did. To make up for the lost time, managers would speed up the machine process expecting the works to complete the same amount of work as they did before the hours were cut.

wga5.jpg
Photo: The Archives of Labor and Urban Affairs, Wayne State University.

. . . and not a latte in sight.

Bookmark and Share

Follow WOT Daily on twitter and subscribe to this blog's rss feed right now!.

Related Post

  • Man involved in Obama threat… (March 15th, 2010)
  • Nurses: Sexual gratification not part of patient care (March 15th, 2010)
  • Walmart fires Michigan man for using medical marijuana (March 15th, 2010)
  • NASA featuring Tom Waits Spacious Thoughts (video by Flourescent Hill) (March 15th, 2010)
  • Democratic Counter Says He’s Got The Votes (March 14th, 2010)

4 Comments Received

Somebodyunfamous
January 25th, 2008 @2:19 pm  

My friend sent me this, since I was a telecommunications major and my plan upon graduating was to move to California and write screenplays:

Hope that works, it seemed funny that she happened to send that to me, right after I read this post!

Somebodyunfamous
January 25th, 2008 @2:21 pm  

Ok, ya, guess that didn’t work, here’s the link:
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/4349/soto01zc3.jpg

Ian
January 25th, 2008 @4:36 pm  

Haha, I like the pic. Best of luck on your future career.

Nathan Blair
March 4th, 2008 @10:22 am  

I’m biased because I’m a reader, but how sad is it that only 2% more people would rather read than watch reruns if no new shows were on?! At least reading was at the top of the list.

And I like the difference in the strike photos from now and 1912. Bayonets vs. girls holding animals. I guess strikes just ain’t what they used to be.

Leave A Reply

Please Note: Comments maybe under moderation after you submit your comments so there is no need to resubmit your comment again

« Awesome Readability
Hell Hath No Fury . . . »

Search

Feeds

feeds
get latest updates on news and subscribes to our feeds
feeds

Sponsors



Tire Rack - Revolutionizing Tire Buying



Auto Parts and Accessories @ Amazon



Auto Parts Warehouse $50 OFF



Find a Car on Cars.com



Recent Posts

    • Nexus One sales continue to disappoint
    • Hubby keeps house, wife takes roof
    • Theft suspect caught with $26K stuffed in bra
    • Beckham Injury Requires Surgery
    • Pair faces jail time in Dubai over kiss

Pages

    • About Us
      • Infringement Policy
      • Privacy Statement
      • Terms Of Use
Box-Tube Box Modulize WordPress Theme By Dezzain Studio
©2006-2010 WOT Daily
Powered by WordPress 2.9.1    Valid XHTML    Valid CSS